tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1561117430251791241.post9176640665352583246..comments2009-02-27T04:30:55.459-08:00Comments on Created and Rational: A Review of Answers In Genesis' review of Eugenie ...Created Rationalisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07141140658187002847noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1561117430251791241.post-7908900178042456842009-02-27T04:30:00.000-08:002009-02-27T04:30:00.000-08:00Why Life's Genesis Is UnrepeatableQUOTE (HenisDov ...Why Life's Genesis Is Unrepeatable<BR/><BR/><BR/>QUOTE (HenisDov @ May 18 2007, PhysForum) <BR/>A. If one accepts, intuitively and logically, Pasteur's observation .... We are just beginning to comprehend the nature of the raw material called Life and that the purpose of OUR life is ours to choose and develop and follow.<BR/>Dov <BR/><BR/><BR/>I am asked, by TracerTong, two questions:<BR/><BR/>A. Shouldn't it (life's genesis) be repeatable? Wouldn't scientists have already been able to repeat it? <BR/><BR/>B. What about 'spiritual' happenings? Is it logical to assume only 'natural' genesis?<BR/><BR/><BR/>My answers:<BR/><BR/>A. Today's "scientists" are unable to "repeat it" because (1) they do not know how the first "life" arose and (2) they do not and will never know and will not be able to duplicate the environments and circumstances of genesis and (3) they do not and will never know and will never be able to repeat the environments and circumstances of post genesis evolution.<BR/><BR/>B. "Spiritual happenings" are virtual reality affairs. They are feasible only for living organisms that have a culture, i.e. that have a pattern of sensings and reactions to the sensings. Genes, and therefore also genomes, are organisms and display virtual reality phenomena, therefore also multicelled organisms, like dogs and humans, display such "spiritual" phenomena. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Dov Henis<BR/>(Comments From The 22nd Century)<BR/> Life's Manifest<BR/> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578<BR/> EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200<BR/> http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=405&#entry396201<BR/> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/100/122.page#1407Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com